‎23-year-old Christopher Todd Erick lost his life in Arizona after a mental health crisis. His mother, Kim Smith, was listed as his emergency contact — but due to a paperwork error, he was recorded as “unclaimed.” That mistake changed everything.

 ‎23-year-old Christopher Todd Erick lost his life in Arizona after a mental health crisis. His mother, Kim Smith, was listed as his emergency contact — but due to a paperwork error, he was recorded as “unclaimed.” That mistake changed everything.

‎

‎Kim was never notified. She never got to bury him. Years later, while watching news coverage about the “Real Bodies” anatomical exhibit in Las Vegas, she recognized a face that stopped her heart.

‎

‎It was Christopher. His body had been plastinated — preserved for display — and placed in a public exhibition without her knowledge or consent.

‎

‎Kim is now fighting in court to bring him home, to give him dignity in death, and to change how unclaimed bodies are handled so no family ever faces this again.

‎

‎ This case has sparked national debate — not about science vs. art — but about consent, humanity, and the basic right to a dignified farewell. Because no parent should ever have to find their child this way.

The discovery sent shockwaves through Kim’s life. What she thought was an ordinary news segment turned into a nightmare — one that blurred the line between grief and disbelief. Seeing her son’s face on a screen, years after being told nothing, reopened a wound that never had the chance to heal.

As investigators looked deeper, troubling questions emerged. How could a documented emergency contact be ignored? How did a young man with a family become classified as “unclaimed”? The answers revealed gaps in a system meant to protect the vulnerable — gaps where paperwork outweighs personhood.

The exhibit itself soon came under scrutiny. While organizers claimed legal acquisition, critics pointed out the absence of clear, verifiable consent. Christopher had never agreed to have his body displayed. To Kim, this wasn’t education or art — it was a violation of trust, identity, and basic human dignity.

Public reaction was swift and divided. Some defended anatomical exhibits as valuable tools for learning. Others saw something darker: a profit-driven industry operating in moral gray zones, where the voiceless can be turned into displays without accountability. Christopher’s story became the human face of that debate.

Now, Kim’s fight is bigger than her own loss. She’s pushing for reforms that ensure families are notified, consent is unquestionable, and no one disappears into bureaucracy again. Her goal is simple but powerful — to bring her son home, and to make sure no other parent ever has to recognize their child on a screen instead of at a graveside.